Pluto conjunct NN but in different signs/houses

Hi everyone,

I am aware that when Pluto is conjunct the NN there is no PPP, and the soul “has been working to transform the area represented by the house and sign locality of conjunction within the last few lifetimes, and is meant to continue in that direction.”

How do you interpret this when Pluto and the NN are placed in different signs and houses?

For example, a chart I am looking at has Pluto in Virgo 5th house with the NN in Leo 4th. Of course, we need to factor in the consideration of how correct the birth time is. It is tricky with this chart because this conjunction also occurs alongside Uranus in Leo 4th and Mars in Virgo 5th, all opposite the Moon and SN in Aquarius 10th and Chiron in Pisces 11th house.

How do you get a handle on “combining” all these archetypes together?

The way I have been able to understand it so far is that as a bottom-line the soul has desired to make adjustments to the ways in which it actualises itself and how these desires are consciously acted upon. This has then created crises in order to bring awareness to what is in need of adjustment. However, these crises have also contributed to a series of traumas that have resulted in extreme fragmentation to the emotional body and wounding to their sense of personal purpose and ultimate meaning in life. The intention is to continue working in this direction of making the necessary adjustments not only as a means of continuing to make the necessary adjusments, but also healing as a way to reintegrate what has become disintegrated and fragmented as a result of the previous traumas, progressively nurturing/creating a new sense of personal purpose and ultimate meaning in life that develops as consequence of the adjustments and healing that occurs.

Am I on the right track?

To add further quandary, this chart also has a skipped step, with Venus in Taurus squaring the nodal axis from the 1st house, the resolution node being SN. From my experience with this personal, there is a determination to relate with others and within themselves strictly on their own terms, as a by-product of previous trauma experienced. But does the skipped step suggest tnat whilst on the one hand the Taurus/1st orientation serves as a means to heal the emotional body and the ways in which the person relates to others and themselves from previous traumas, it is still aiming to serve the original intention of making necessary adjustments to the ways in which the soul actualises itself and consciously acts upon its desires, so that past crises and resulting traumas are not re-created?

Thank you

LAS