The JWG EA Forum

Hi Rad, I know that this could be sensitive or triggering for others, but I have a question about the exchange of karma or taking on the karma of others as I had a client who recently told me about their mom having multiple affairs while she was pregnant with them. My question is does the soul who is in the mothers womb take on the karma of sexual partners the mother has if there are multiple sexual partners? In this case it was affairs, but you don't have to be married to have multiple partners while pregnant. I also can see how in matriarchal times that wasn't frowned upon because it would have served as the exchange of knowledge when practiced naturally. What would be the different reasons for this dynamic? One reason for this dynamic I can see depending on the stage of evolution is how a soul would want to experience these dynamics within the womb as a way to take on the karma of others early on as a sacrifice. This wouldn't have to be negative either, but as a spiritual sacrifice, possibly? Could this be correct? What would be some of the other reasons if you have seen them in your practice? Much Love and Gratitude, Jordyn

Hi Rad, I have a couple of questions that came up for me today when looking at a composite chart of a friend and their partner. I understand both of the people's natal charts and synastry, I was seeing how their natal charts also interacted with their composite. How the composite was helping facilitate both of their individual growth (their bottom lines) and why they came together as a way to help with that individually and collectively (composite). These questions are more geared towards the composite chart itself. Their Pluto was in the 4th in a full phase opposition to Mars in the 10th, Jupiter in the 11th square the Nodes (sn in 1st, nn in 7th) with the resolution the NN in the 7th. The ruler of their Jupiter was conjunct the ruler of their Lunar NN in a new phase (resolution), and the ruler of their Jupiter that squares the Nodes has the same ruler of their SN. When looking at the Full phase opposition between Mars and Pluto, it is accurate that they have been working together on these evolutionary dynamics together for multiple lifetimes, correct? Including this skipped step? Pluto, Mars, and the Nodes, along with the moon are all in angular houses which reinstates this and that there is a need to go backwards in order to go forwards. With Pluto and Mars in this phasal relationship wouldn't this also indicate a core lifetime to work on this together? Or that it is further emphasized, these dynamics? I think what is having me ponder more is the planet that is part of the skipped step, its ruler is conjunct the resolution node's ruler in a new phase (the ruler of the SN and the planet square the nodes is the same,too), yet Pluto and Mars in a Full Phase opposition. Bottom line and in a very general sense, can this be about in order to resolve these long standing dynamics that created the skipped step they have to revisit the past and liberate from old choices and beliefs, then to make new choices that help facilitate the resolution of the skipped step and to transition into a new cycle of evolution ( New phase conjunction is in the 6th) and to not deny or try to control a certain outcome or expectation? I know that I have to read the chart as a whole, and trust me I am, and I feel this is being reflected back through what they have told me, but I just have never seen that Pluto Mars phase with a skipped step and the rulers of the resolution node and planet conjunct in a new phase and want to make sure I am understanding this correctly. Or if there is anything you would add to this? I know I am not going deep into their chart, but it is more about what that means when you see these dynamics within the chart. Especially the phasal relationships of what I have talked about. Let me know if I need to clarify something, please. Much Love and Gratitude, Jordyn

Hi Rad, This is a strange question but maybe you can clarify. I came accross the amazing soul of Simone Weil, she was a french philosopher with little recognition in her time but who is considered now to to be a mystic, a soldier, a saint, a teacher, and i would say and extraordinary altruistic soul. Here is a link to wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simone_Weil Seeing her chart and her soul's life (she died young at 34) a thought came to mind if she could be the soul of Joan of Arc or, if it is somehow in the same family tree? I imagine that at least they are the same soul type, even though i found at least two charts possibel for Joan of Arc, but if you can clarify that would be very interesting to know, and also which is the chart you use for Joan of Arc? Thank you, Helena